Skip Navigation


QJM Advance Access originally published online on February 20, 2008
QJM 2008 101(5):365-369; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcn011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/365    most recent
hcn011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, C.J.
Right arrow Articles by Travis, S.P.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, C.J.
Right arrow Articles by Travis, S.P.L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A 15-year audit of home parenteral nutrition provision at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford

C.J. Green, V. Mountford, H. Hamilton, M.G.W. Kettlewell and S.P.L. Travis

From the Department of Gastroenterology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

Address correspondence to C.J. Green, Department of Gastroenterology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. email: carolinegreen{at}doctors.net.uk

Received 22 October 2007 and in revised form 7 January 2008


   Abstract

Background: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is an established option for patients suffering from intestinal failure, often pending definitive surgery, but sometimes for life or pending intestinal transplant. Care for patients with HPN is provided at centres other than designated intestinal failure units in the UK, but there are few data on outcomes.

Aim: To audit the standard of care at one such centre using objective measures to compare with results published from other centres and intestinal failure units.

Design: 15-year retrospective audit of paper and computer-based records of all HPN patients (1990–2004).

Methods: Demographic data, major line and metabolic complication rates and mortality were collected and analysed.

Results: 88 patients received HPN for a total period of 121 patient-years (median duration 217.8 days, range 18.3–3881.2, median age 40, range 3–73). Principal reasons for HPN were Crohns’ disease (35.2%), mesenteric, infarction (11.4%), surgical complications (17.0%), intestinal motility disorder (10.7%). The frequency of major complications were line sepsis (0.35 episodes/patient-year), line occlusion (0.25 episodes/patient-year), subacute bacterial endocarditis (0.02 episodes/patient-year), cholestasis (0.17 episodes/patient-year) and central venous thrombosis (0.03 episodes/patient-year). Indications and complications were all within the range of published data.

Conclusions: HPN can be delivered effectively outside designated intestinal failure units and the current data are representative of a standard of care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.