Skip Navigation


QJM Advance Access originally published online on August 8, 2008
QJM 2008 101(10):821-824; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcn099
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/10/821    most recent
hcn099v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thiébaut, R.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thiébaut, R.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

When it is better to estimate a slope with only one point

R. Thiébaut1,2,3 and S. Walker4

From the 1INSERM U897 Epidemiology & Biostatistics 2Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, F-33076 Bordeaux, France 3Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Institute of Child Health, University College London and 4Medical Research Council – Clinical Trial Unit, London, UK

Address correspondence to R. Thiébaut, INSERM U897 Epidemiology & Biostatistics, ISPED, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 146 rue Léo Saignat 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France. email: rodolphe.thiebaut{at}isped.u-bordeaux2.fr


  Abstract

When investigating the change in a biomarker, it is often believed that at least two measurements are needed from each participant, and that those with only one measurement should be excluded. In this short note, we explain why this could lead to imprecise and biased estimates. Furthermore, we discuss a standard statistical method that handles such issues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.