Skip Navigation

QJM 2007 100(6):351-359; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcm032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alemán, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fernández De Sevilla, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alemán, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fernández De Sevilla, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Differentiating between malignant and idiopathic pleural effusions: the value of diagnostic procedures

C. Alemán, L. Sanchez, J. Alegre, E. Ruiz, A. Vázquez, T. Soriano, J. Sarrapio, J. Teixidor1, J. Andreu2, E. Felip3, L. Armadans4 and T. Fernández De Sevilla

From the Departments of Internal Medicine, 1Thoracic Surgery, 2Radiology, 3Oncology and 4Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital General Vall d’Hebron, Autonomous University, Barcelona, Spain

Address correspondence to Dra. Carmen Alemán, Hospital Vall d’Hebron. Department of Internal Medicine, Passeig Vall d’hebron 119–129, Barcelona 08035, Spain. email: 29261cal{at}comb.es

Received 26 July 2006 and in revised form 29 January 2007


   Abstract

Background: Which diagnostic procedures should be used to differentiate between idiopathic and malignant pleural effusions, is not well established.

Aim: To identify which parameters allow differentiation between idiopathic and malignant pleural effusions.

Design: Case-note review.

Methods: Over a 12-year period, we treated 1014 consecutive pleural effusion patients, of whom 346 were diagnosed as having an idiopathic or malignant aetiology. We analysed medical history, chest X-ray, pleural fluid analysis (biochemical, microbiological and cytological), chest CT scan and additional examinations that were used according to clinical findings, and compared them with the eventual diagnosis and outcome.

Results: Eighty-three patients with idiopathic effusions and 263 with malignant effusions were included. Idiopathic pleural effusion resolved in 47 patients, improved in 20 and persisted in 16. Biochemical pleural fluid analysis did not predict these outcomes. A history of neoplasm, chest X-ray and CT features, as well as additional examinations according to clinical findings, established a diagnosis or suspicion of malignancy in 256 (97.7%) of the 263 patients who received a diagnosis of malignant effusion. Diagnostic thoracoscopy was helpful in seven patients in whom malignant disease was strongly suspected, despite the absence of other pathological findings.

Discussion: Non-invasive complementary examinations generally allowed accurate differentiation between malignant and idiopathic effusions. Patients with idiopathic pleural effusions generally had favourable outcomes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.