Skip Navigation


QJM Advance Access originally published online on September 10, 2007
QJM 2007 100(10):635-640; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcm077
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/10/635    most recent
hcm077v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kariyawasan, C.C.
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, A.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kariyawasan, C.C.
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, A.B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Multiple myeloma: causes and consequences of delay in diagnosis

C.C. Kariyawasan1, D.A. Hughes1, M.M. Jayatillake2 and A.B. Mehta1

From the 1Department of Academic Haematology, Royal Free Hospital and University College Medical School, London, UK, and 2Department of Pathology, Colombo North Teaching Hospital, Ragama, Sri Lanka

Address correspondence to Dr A.B. Mehta, Department of Academic Haematology, Royal Free Hospital and University College Medical School, London NW3 2QG, UK. email: atul.mehta{at}royalfree.nhs.uk

Received 8 March 2007 and in revised form 24 June 2007


   Abstract

Background: Myeloma is a serious and usually fatal haematological malignancy with reported mortality of 10–20% within the first 2 months of presentation. Symptoms are non-specific, and patients thus present to a range of medical practitioners.

Aim: To analyse the causes and consequences of a delay in diagnosis of myeloma.

Design: Retrospective case review.

Methods: The number and type of disease–related complications present at diagnosis of 92 patients with myeloma were categorized according to the medical practitioner to whom the patient initially presented, the time before diagnosis and the status of the patient at study end in 2006. Overall and disease-free survival were analysed.

Results: Duration of symptoms >6 months prior to diagnosis was seen in 40% of the patients, of whom >50% had initially consulted a general practitioner. The most common presenting symptom (67%) was bone pain. The most common complications present at diagnosis were anaemia (54%), bone disease (45%) and renal failure (36%), with the highest frequency of complications in the group experiencing symptoms for >6 months. All patients in this group had two or more complications, while 40% in the group with symptoms for <3 months had no complications. A prolonged time to diagnosis had a significant effect on disease-free survival from both onset of first symptoms (p = 0.043) and from diagnosis (p = 0.003), but not on overall survival.

Discussion: A prolonged delay before diagnosis is associated with a significant impact on the clinical course of multiple myeloma. There is a need to raise awareness of the presentation of this condition, especially among general practitioners.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Y. Kristinsson, A. R. Derolf, G. Edgren, P. W. Dickman, and M. Bjorkholm
Socioeconomic Differences in Patient Survival Are Increasing for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Multiple Myeloma in Sweden
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2009; 27(12): 2073 - 2080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.